Traders in Sudan have lamented the suspension of export ban on raw peanuts by the government.
The country has been a top producer of peanuts for so long.
But traders of the product has been left reeling, following the export ban by their government.
Rimaz Ahmed, commercial director of Abnaa Sayed Elobeid, one of Sudan’s major agricultural export companies, expressed his indignation about the sudden decision of the trade ministry to ban the export of raw peanuts.
The government said it wants Sudan to process the nuts inside the country to earn more money. But traders said they were not given time to prepare.
“It’s a shock because we were not warned,” Ahmed said, of the April 1 restrictions.
“Overnight, we lost important markets. Immediately, India replaced us,” he said.
The two main customers for Sudan’s peanuts were China and Indonesia, AFP reported.
On the wall of Ahmed’s office, a poster in English praising the crops — “Peanuts: a Culture with the Flavors of Sudan” — seems to be from another time.
The export ban was a shock for many in the African nation, which, according to the UN, is the fifth largest peanut producer, with 14 percent of world production.
Protein-rich peanuts, which are also called groundnuts, provide rural employment and much needed foreign exchange.
Before the trade ban, peanuts were Sudan’s fifth biggest international earner after gold, sesame, oil and livestock.
The decision comes at a tough time for the country.
Sudan produced 1.5 million tonnes in 2019, worth 205 million dollars, according to central bank figures, up from 59 million dollars earned in 2018.
While defending the ban, trade Minister, Madani Abbas Madani stated that the ban was aimed at maximizing the market value of peanuts and the added value of Sudanese products, in light of climate change which affects the quality” of the product.
For the government, the hope is that Sudan can earn more money through selling products from processed peanuts — such as oil or butter.
Critics of the ban on exporting unprocessed nuts have questioned why it was introduced so abruptly, suggesting that it might be a personal whim of the trade minister.
But the minister has insisted his decision was “within the framework of government policy”.
“We agree in principle it may be good for the country, but we are not at all prepared,” Ahmed said.
“We have neither the machines nor the know-how. It will take time — and in the meantime we have lost our big customers,” he added.
